Logo
uah
mainfo for uah: videos, blogs, definitions, info, downloads, links, Q&A
uah


 
 
Advertisment

 
Wikipedia

UAH can refer to either: * Ukrainian hryvnia - the national currency of Ukraine * University of Alabama in Huntsville UAH...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAH
 
Links

 
 
Blogs

http://www.visitkievukraine.com/news/wizz-air-to-bring-cheap-flights-to-ukraine/
Wizz Air to bring cheap flights to Ukraine (by: dave)
On September 15 the company will launch its international flights from Kiev. The destinations initially served will be London Luton, Dortmund, and Milan Bergamo. Prices for one-way flights to Milan/Dortmund will start at UAH 199.

http://rotstar.blogspot.com/2008/06/as-earth-cools-eco-wackos-heads-explode.html
As The Earth Cools Eco-Wackou0026#39;s Heads Explode (by: LifeTrek)
It is significantly colder globally, colder even than the significant drop to -0.046°C seen in January 2008. The global ∆T from April to May 2008 was -.195°C. UAH 2008 1 -0.046 2008 2 0.020 2008 3 0.094 2008 4 0.015 2008 5 -0.180 ...

http://news08.join.com.ua/?pu003d1967
Цена золота понизилась - НБУ (by: admin)
Платина - 97040.00 UAH (-). С начала месяца официальный курс золота подешевел на 1.76%. С начала квартала официальный курс золота подешевел на 10.76%. С начала года официальный курс золота подорожал на 1.73%. ...

http://news08.join.com.ua/?pu003d1966
Курс доллара остался на прежнем уровне - НБУ (by: admin)
С начала месяца официальный курс USD/UAH не изменился. С начала квартала официальный курс USD/UAH подешевел на 3.92%. С начала года официальный курс USD/UAH подешевел на 3.92%. Как сообщалось ранее, максимальный курс USD/UAH, ...

 
Videos

 
 
Downloads

 
Definition

3 definitions found for tuberculosis:

From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48:

Tuberculosis Tu*ber`cu*lo"sis, n. [NL. See Tubercle.] (Med.) A constitutional disease caused by infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (also called the Tubercle bacillus), characterized by the production of tubercles in the internal organs, and especially in the lungs, where it constitutes the most common variety of pulmonary phthisis (consumption). The Mycobacteria are slow-growing and without cell walls, and are thus not affected by the beta-lactam antibiotics; treatment is difficult, usually requiring simultaneous administration of multiple antibiotics to effect a cure. Prior to availability of antibiotic treatment, the cure required extensive rest, for which special sanatoriums were constructed. [1913 Webster +PJC]


From WordNet (r) 2.0:

tuberculosis n : infection transmitted by inhalation or ingestion of tubercle bacilli and manifested in fever and small lesions (usually in the lungs but in various other parts of the body in acute stages) [syn: TB, T.B.]


From Moby Thesaurus II by Grady Ward, 1.0:

165 Moby Thesaurus words for "tuberculosis": African lethargy, Asiatic cholera, Chagres fever, German measles, Haverhill fever, TB, acute articular rheumatism, aerogenic tuberculosis, ague, alkali disease, ambulatory plague, amebiasis, amebic dysentery, anthrax, bacillary dysentery, bastard measles, black death, black fever, black plague, blackwater fever, breakbone fever, brucellosis, bubonic plague, cachectic fever, cellulocutaneous plague, cerebral rheumatism, cerebral tuberculosis, chicken pox, cholera, colliquation, consumption, cowpox, dandy fever, deer fly fever, defervescing plague, dengue, dengue fever, diphtheria, disseminated tuberculosis, dumdum fever, dysentery, elephantiasis, encephalitis lethargica, enteric fever, epidemic, epiphytotic, epizootic, erysipelas, famine fever, five-day fever, flu, frambesia, glandular fever, glandular plague, grippe, hansenosis, hemorrhagic plague, hepatitis, herpes, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, histoplasmosis, hookworm, hydrophobia, infantile paralysis, infectious mononucleosis, inflammatory rheumatism, influenza, jail fever, jungle rot, kala azar, kissing disease, larval plague, lepra, leprosy, leptospirosis, loa loa, loaiasis, lockjaw, lupus vulgaris, madness, malaria, malarial fever, marsh fever, measles, meningitis, milzbrand, mumps, murrain, ornithosis, osteomyelitis, pandemia, pandemic, paratyphoid fever, parotitis, parrot fever, pertussis, pest, pesthole, pestilence, phthisis, plague, plague spot, pneumonia, pneumonic plague, polio, poliomyelitis, polyarthritis rheumatism, ponos, premonitory plague, psittacosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, rabbit fever, rabies, rat-bite fever, relapsing fever, rheumatic fever, rickettsialpox, ringworm, rubella, rubeola, scarlatina, scarlet fever, schistosomiasis, scourge, scrofula, scrofuloderma, septic sore throat, septicemic plague, shingles, siderating plague, sleeping sickness, sleepy sickness, smallpox, snail fever, splenic fever, spotted fever, strep throat, swamp fever, tetanus, thrush, tinea, trench fever, trench mouth, tuberculosis cutis, tuberculosis luposa, tuberculous meningitis, tularemia, typhoid, typhoid fever, typhus, typhus fever, undulant fever, vaccinia, varicella, variola, venereal disease, viral dysentery, white plague, whooping cough, yaws, yellow fever, yellow jack, zona, zoster

 
Questions & Answers

Why is a graph that clearly shows that global warming is not caused by CO2, being posted?
Recently an advocate of AGW posted a graph from Wikipedia that was intended to prove that the surface record was not contaminated by urbanization. Climate models indicate that the troposphere should have warmed 1.3 times faster than the earths surface. The graph shows trends from 1982 - 2004, as listed below. Surface : +0.187˚C/Decade (BLUE) UAH : +0.163˚C/Decade (RED) RSS : +0.239˚C/Decade (GREEN) The UAH indicates that the surface warmed at a faster rate than the atmosphere, which disproves the CO2 theory. RSS indicates that the atmosphere warmed at 1.278 times faster than the surface which supports the theory, but the RSS correction involves utilizing a climate model to make it's corrections which seems suspicious. And the graph computes the slopes starting at 1982, which also is very suspicious. It seems that if the slopes were computed from 1979 neither would support AGW. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_temperature_measurements Thoughts? gcnp58: Most people do not doubt the planet is warming, and nothing has been put to bed yest. Do a little research on diurnal corrections before you open that trap of yours about this subject. EDIT: Keith P Everyone has been trying to solve this problem. The satellite data originally showed a cooling trend, so all parties involved have worked very hard trying to de trend this very expensive dataset. As far as the Stratosphere, Dana and I went round and round about this very subject, if you are interested. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmG2x1D5V2CiYxfeZPSjdQMS.Rd.;_ylv=3?qid=20070920110335AAQQ5O0 EDIT Cosmo Thats pretty lame, if you had 20 blankets on the bed already, do you think adding another one would make any difference? Thats been demonstrated in the lab as well. EDIT: Bob I know your position, but you make my point, If you believe in AGW, you are trusting in computer simulations. I have written hundreds of thousands of lines of source code for the purpose of computer simulations, I know of their limitations, and I don't trust their ability to predict the future, utilizing finite differencing schemes and differential equations. Sorry..

Very likely this is contamination of the data from the cooling stratosphere. Christy and Spence (UAH data authors) have tied themselves in knots trying to correct for it, finally arriving at a Rube Goldberg algorithm that degrades overall accuracy and increases contamination from the surface. I should also point out that stratospheric cooling is (a) unchallenged; and (b) strong evidence of increased greenhouse effect.



is uah a private or public school?
@qaa_question

I went to both up to 5th grade private and then went to public so i got to be more well rounded.



Why do skeptics claim atmospheric data does not support global warming theory?
The surface record finds warming of approximately +0.07°C per decade over the past century and +0.17°C per decade since 1979. Deriving trends for the lower troposphere in which the stratospheric cooling is removed: RSS v3.0 finds a trend of +0.181 °C per decade UAH analysis finds +0.14 °C per decade An alternative adjustment introduced by Fu et al finds trends (1979-2001) of +0.19 °C per decade when applied to the RSS data set. A less regularly updated analysis is that of Vinnikov and Grody with +0.22°C to +0.26°C per decade(1978 - 2002). Links to each paper available here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_temperature_record Graphically available here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Satellite_Temperatures.png The UAH shows slightly less warming in the troposphere than the surface, all other studies show greater warming in the troposphere as models predict. How is this evidence against the anthropogenic global warming theory, as Tomcat claims? James read the question next time. It clearly states that the papers are all LINKED from the Wikipedia page. James read the question next time. It clearly states that the papers are all LINKED from the Wikipedia page. truthsfifth - the stratosphere is supposed to cool. That's part of the global warming theory as well. The troposphere warms and stratosphere cools. I don't know why you start babbling about Bill Clinton. The past 100 years of warming have been primarily caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, and secondarily due to variations in the Sun (mostly prior to 1975): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png Please take some time to learn about the science behind global warming. Tomcat, way to avoid answering the question. Try reading the caption next time: "Note: In the above figure, there is still a significant discrepancy between the very earliest satellite measurements and the ground based measurements at that time. For this reason only the interval 1982-2005 was used in calculating each trend."

It seems to me that Tomcat's attitude is that of the responsible skeptic, open to new information as it comes in. See, for example, his chosen Best Answer and reasoning here: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Amiq6ryzHIWA1xM78TwdOr3ty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20070922185114AAggylf&show=7#profile-info-pZi3HXdnaa In the meantime, I remain a bit leery of all satellite-borne observations to derive atmospheric temperature at altitude. The single advantage of satellite observation is global coverage, but the vertical resolution is really horrible, no matter what algorithm you use to slice & dice the data. And since it's vertical resolution, more than global coverage, which is at issue (if indeed it really is an issue), the only way to get that right is to use balloon-borne instruments. Since 1958, the regression slope for surface temps has been +1.3°C per century, and for 850 hPa pressure altitude, it has been +1.6°C per century. This is pretty much exactly what theory and models predict. Here's the radiosonde data from Hadley: http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadat/hadat2/hadat2_monthly_global_mean.txt